guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#bennett-ellis-matlock-llc-et-al-v-fiblywibly
This is the start of #bennett-ellis-matlock-llc-et-al-v-fiblywibly channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-10 03:11 p.m.
New Case
Case Type
civil
Case Number
CV-435-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:02 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-10 03:11 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Chancellor Cabot.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:11 p.m.
Hi
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:12 p.m.
Who am I adding
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-10 08:12 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @Brenda to the case channel.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:12 p.m.
24 hours CC
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:12 p.m.
@Brenda
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
24 hours CC
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:12 p.m.
Thank you, I will have this soon
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:23 p.m.
Thanks
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-10 08:23 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:24 p.m.
@meowiitten Hi waive summons?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-10 08:24 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @fiblywibly to the case channel.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:24 p.m.
okay jesus 29 pages
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:24 p.m.
lord have mercy
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 08:24 p.m.
Its not text searchable
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 08:25 p.m.
I can't do anything with this
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:25 p.m.
Is there a rule that requires it to be text searchable-
😭1
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 08:25 p.m.
Yes
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:26 p.m.
OK, I will create a text-searchable copy. Hold on
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 08:27 p.m.
@cabot I will raise the preliminary issue of ripeness since no fees have actually been collected yet
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:27 p.m.
@cabot And I would counter that by citing Susan b. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:27 p.m.
great thank you, make reps tonight both of you i will address in the morning as im hungry
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:27 p.m.
This is very much impending
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:27 p.m.
preemptive challenge?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:28 p.m.
Yes, Your Honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:28 p.m.
Where a plaintiff alleges an intention to engage in proscribed conduct, that suffices for pre-enforcement standing
✅1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:28 p.m.
We intend to ignore and violate these unconstitutional, unlawful, and tortious Levies entirely
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:28 p.m.
And therefore we will suffer harm.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:28 p.m.
okay feel free to make oral reps about this tmrw and ill decide on it, but do not insult eachother or address eachother or im ruling for the opposing side
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:28 p.m.
and submit your args in one single message
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:29 p.m.
bless you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:30 p.m.
@cabot Your Honor, as a preliminary matter, I would move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining Defendant from continuing to deny me access to the DoS Discord server
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:30 p.m.
I was muted for 3 days, and then that mute was increased to 7 days randomly, after I encouraged business owners to contact me to file a legal action
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:30 p.m.
All in clear violation of my First Amendment right to freely express myself in a public/limited-public forum
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:31 p.m.
I would rule in your favour on that request but I believe the last time I consulted CA on this I was told this was a moderation issue
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:31 p.m.
@krabz
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 08:31 p.m.
@Brenda Can you send the text searchable copy
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:31 p.m.
Uploading shortly
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:32 p.m.
@cabot It appears it exceeds the MB limit. Does Your Honor mind if I file the text-searchable copy in Clark County discord server and send a message link here?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
Sure
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
@meowiitten @cabot
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
:😭:
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
im crying
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
gagged
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 08:33 p.m.
Anyway.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
I would rule in your favour on that request but I believe the last time I consulted CA on this I was told this was a moderation issue
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:36 p.m.
@turntable @turntable (SecState muted me cuz he was petty I wanted to sue-)
😭1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 08:36 p.m.
(Please give permission so I can have this challenged)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:14 p.m.
@cabot Count VII should be dismissed sua sponte for lack of justiciability given muting and server action involves community rules
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:14 p.m.
Or just remove it @Brenda
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:14 p.m.
I'm not removing anything
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:14 p.m.
If CA wants to intervene, they may make their intentions known
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:14 p.m.
Otherwise, this Court should proceed to act, as it has done in the past, until CA decides that this is a matter best handled by them
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:15 p.m.
@cabot Your Honor, seeing as there's been no answer from CA, we ask that the Court enter a TRO enjoining the mute and any further mutes
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:17 p.m.
Lmfao
meowiittenmeowiitten
@cabot Count VII should be dismissed sua sponte for lack of justiciability given muting and server action involves community rules
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:17 p.m.
@cabot and I stress here, as I did in the complaint, that there is no rule that prohibits advertising in #business-discussion. There is also no community rule that prohibits this. Therefore, FiblyWibly was not "enforcing community rules" as opposing counsel would suggest
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:17 p.m.
I could go in Clark County general and advertise my legal services as wildly, loudly, and promiscuously as I want to, and no mod would stop me
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:17 p.m.
That's because it's not a community rule
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:18 p.m.
It's an unwritten, made-up rule / otherwise known as retaliation to speech
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:18 p.m.
Buddy you don't write the community rules
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:18 p.m.
This isn't how it works
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:18 p.m.
They're publicly posted
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:19 p.m.
The rules of the DoS server are similarly publicly posted
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:19 p.m.
Nothing about advertising in #business-discussion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:19 p.m.
Your first amendment doesn't apply in a discord server buddy
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:19 p.m.
Your clark county first amendment right doesn't apply here(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:19 p.m.
This Court's precedent, and real-life precedent, would hold otherwise
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 09:19 p.m.
And I would discourage cross-talk as it clutters the channel, straining judicial eyes
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 09:20 p.m.
Why you so retardeddddedddddd
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 10:10 p.m.
Count VII is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-10 10:10 p.m.
Any other representations
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:11 p.m.
I, for one, feel better knowing it was considered.
😭2
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:12 p.m.
@cabot Your Honor, we move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Levies and the Financial Report scheme that Defendant FiblyWibly has imposed. Genuinely, they are unconstitutional and devoid of any statutory basis
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:13 p.m.
@Brenda Can you file an amended complaint removing count vii and factual background section ii
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:13 p.m.
Both are immaterial now
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:13 p.m.
Well, it was dismissed, not struck
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:13 p.m.
It'
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:14 p.m.
I'm sure you can pretend it's not there anymore without me needing to redo the entire Complaint
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:14 p.m.
Okay well then section II doesn't need a response in the event answer is required. Deal?
meowiittenmeowiitten
Okay well then section II doesn't need a response in the event answer is required. Deal?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:15 p.m.
Well, no, section II is important when it comes to calculating punitive damages
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:15 p.m.
Him doing a whole coordinated scheme to suppress the lawsuit from coming to fruition speaks to his state of mind and wanton disregard for our rights
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:15 p.m.
Don't be ridiculous
BrendaBrenda
Him doing a whole coordinated scheme to suppress the lawsuit from coming to fruition speaks to his state of mind and wanton disregard for our rights
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:15 p.m.
I'll let @cabot rule on this matter
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:16 p.m.
Section II only relates to the now dismissed Count VII(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:16 p.m.
(he wants us to circumcise the Factual Allegations)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:16 p.m.
So in an answer it will just say "Denied to the extent an answer is needed" something along those lines
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:18 p.m.
FiblyWibly censoring information about the lawsuit is absolutely relevant when it comes to deciphering his state of mind. Clearly, he knew that he was doing something illegal, otherwise he would not feel the need to silence my law firm.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:18 p.m.
And all this will be extremely relevant when considering an award of punitive damages.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-10 10:23 p.m.
@Brenda Are all of these both official and individual capacity
meowiittenmeowiitten
@Brenda Are all of these both official and individual capacity
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:25 p.m.
It's listed under each count in the last paragraph
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-10 10:28 p.m.
Official misconduct = official for equitable relief, individual for damages
Ultra vires = official and/or individual for equitable relief
Deprivation of Rights = official for equitable relief, individual for damages
Conversion = official for equitable relief, individual for damages
Extortion = official for equitable relief, individual for damages
Outrage = individual for damages

*See 5 MSC 1 § 3207.1: "The State of Mayflower shall be liable, respecting the provision of this title [individual torts claims] relating to torts claims, in the same manner and to the same extent as a private indiviudal under like circumstances, but shall not be liable for interest prior to judgment or for punitive damages."
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 02:22 a.m.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF SECRETARY FIBLYWIBLY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
@Brenda @cabot
meowiittenmeowiitten
Okay well then section II doesn't need a response in the event answer is required. Deal?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 06:00 a.m.
Correct
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 06:36 a.m.
@cabot 72 hrs to respond?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 10:11 a.m.
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS W/ REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
@cabot @meowiitten
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:13 a.m.
@cabot We also oppose any suggestion that Defendant has "legislative immunity". FiblyWibly is not the Senate—he's not even a Senator—and his unlawful levies are devoid of any statutory basis, violate 4 MSC 1 § 2202(a), and violate the Federal Constitution. Every reasonable official, in his shoes, would have known this. There's simply no argument to be made about any immunity, let alone legislative immunity.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 11:50 a.m.
Agreed
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Agreed
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:53 a.m.
Don’t be so quick to dismiss it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:54 a.m.
Read further into it
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:55 a.m.
What is there to read into? Mr. Wibly is extorting private entities into lining his pockets. Not the State's pockets—his own pockets.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:55 a.m.
And when I informed him that this is Bribery, he ignored it and seemed to think he is immune from the law.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:56 a.m.
We’re not even there yet buddy and that allegation borders on frivolous
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:56 a.m.
Interesting. Is opposing counsel suggesting that a secret state treasury exists?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:57 a.m.
I can save you time by stating unequiovically that one does not exist. And since extortion is an inchoate tort, his various excuses offer no aid.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:57 a.m.
Also why is my name specifically mentioned as a counterpoint? That’s not proper
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:57 a.m.
That’s like a pro se argument
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:57 a.m.
Fairness toward opposing counsel and candor toward the tribunal are both rules when you practice in this Court.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:58 a.m.
You're making arguments that contradicts your own lawsuits, including a Consent Judgment and Order entered into between you and Fiblywibly
😭1
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:58 a.m.
I am not a party at interest don’t be ridiculous
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 11:58 a.m.
Unless you’re accusing me of fraud on the court
😭2
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:59 a.m.
I'm accusing your arguments of being defective under judicial estoppel.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:59 a.m.
And saying "don’t be ridiculous" after you did something absolutely outrageous doesn't make what you did less outrageous
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 11:59 a.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:00 p.m.
I wasn’t arguing in the name of the state then??? The state wasn’t even in privity? Do you know the standard for estoppel lol???

Also for the record… I never collected attorney’s fees. Either way it’s not relevant what I did in my private practice against private parties
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:00 p.m.
Well, I do think it's important to note that you don't believe in the arguments you're proposing
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:00 p.m.
That's a matter of ethics... proposing a defense without probable cause
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:01 p.m.
Okay, and I said that’s like a pro se argument and it’s laughable
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:01 p.m.
It’s not a proper argument
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:01 p.m.
Not that it can’t be considered
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:04 p.m.
@cabot How long for ruling
BrendaBrenda
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS W/ REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS @cabot @meowiitten
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:06 p.m.
@cabot Since in Section II of this response they admit it’s against the department as a whole (through fibly?), I would just ask you to consider sovereign immunity as well since the state code clearly prevents money damages against a government agency
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:07 p.m.
Long line of cases where money damages were refused against a state agency, even some of my own
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:07 p.m.
No. It's against the department on the official capacity. The individual capacity is against FiblyWibly.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:07 p.m.
I made this extremely clear at the beginning when you asked.
BrendaBrenda
Official misconduct = official for equitable relief, individual for damages Ultra vires = official and/or individual for equitable relief Deprivation of Rights = official for equit...
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:07 p.m.
*
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:08 p.m.
So you cannot have it one way and then the other
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:08 p.m.
There's a long line of cases where you, Mr. Sado, have sued in the individual and official capacity (i.e., quasi-official lawsuits).
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:08 p.m.
His capacity is not that transformative
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:08 p.m.
That's expressly permitted by statute, and it is common in the Federal courts.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:08 p.m.
In fact, it is required for official misconduct. That is a quasi-official. The individual pays the damages.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:08 p.m.
No, not really
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:09 p.m.
😭1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:09 p.m.
Explain to me why money damages are not apt, this capacity stuff is in my opinion stupid so I don't ever read into it
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:09 p.m.
I understand state law prohibits money damages in official capacity cases against the department at wide?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:10 p.m.
But if he's also sued in his individual capacity he can be liable for money damages?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
I understand state law prohibits money damages in official capacity cases against the department at wide?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:10 p.m.
5 MSC 1 § 3207.1 waives sovereign immunity for damages claims, even if I did sue the State of Mayflower for damages (which i didn't): "The State of Mayflower shall be liable, respecting the provision of this title [individual torts claims] relating to torts claims, in the same manner and to the same extent as a private indiviudal under like circumstances, but shall not be liable for interest prior to judgment or for punitive damages."
BrendaBrenda
5 MSC 1 § 3207.1 waives sovereign immunity for damages claims, even if I did sue the State of Mayflower for damages (which i didn't): "The State of Mayflower shall be liable, respe...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:10 p.m.
Do you understand the state of mayflower includes arms of the state(edited)
😭1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:10 p.m.
No such thing as arms and limbs and fingers. Either you sue the state, or you don't.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:10 p.m.
A state agency is the state.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:11 p.m.
Unless your position is that the DoS is part of the State of Quannahassit, in which case you may remove this to the UoC Supreme Court.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:11 p.m.
What's the standard for an award of money damages in their individual capacity whilst they are also sued in their official capacity?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
What's the standard for an award of money damages in their individual capacity whilst they are also sued in their official capacity?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:11 p.m.
Wanton disregard for rights under 42 USC § 1983 (our state equivalent is deprivation of rights)(edited)
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:12 p.m.
Must they have acted in the excess of their official capacity to qualify for individual capacity money damages?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Explain to me why money damages are not apt, this capacity stuff is in my opinion stupid so I don't ever read into it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:12 p.m.
Simply put, he shouldn’t be asked to pay money damages for policy formulation, failing to violate a clearly established right (at least not yet), and for other reasons as well. Even in cases where people tried to sue AG Barr for his deployment of federal agents to the BLM Protests, in his individual capacity, those failed on QI grounds
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:12 p.m.
lol? He's extorting companies to line his own pockets
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:12 p.m.
With no statutory basis, in fact it violates the statute very clearly, and violates the Federal Constitution. He has no immunity because he knowingly and deliberately violated the law through this outrageous scheme.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
And we expressly deny that’s the case. Even if were so, mere threatened extortion (much like conversion) is not extortion by the civil statute
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
Without obtaining any property it can’t be other
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
Extortion is an inchoate tort in the State of Mayflower. The very act of threatening is the extortion
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
You clearly haven't read the Extortion statute we have.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
But I mean one is an alleged excess of powers covered by QI (AG Barr example) and the other one is an alleged excess of powers because of the law of agency which has a rule against self-dealing rule. The latter isn't covered by QI is it?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
At best you have a claim for declaratory and injunctive relief
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
But I mean one is an alleged excess of powers covered by QI (AG Barr example) and the other one is an alleged excess of powers because of the law of agency which has a rule against...
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:14 p.m.
I would say it isn't, Your Honor
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:15 p.m.
The law of agency is clearly established law is it not?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
But I mean one is an alleged excess of powers covered by QI (AG Barr example) and the other one is an alleged excess of powers because of the law of agency which has a rule against...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:15 p.m.
He’s taking a guess at where the money is going. This is like the same “taxes are theft” argument
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
The law of agency is clearly established law is it not?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:15 p.m.
It's not often I ask for $15,000,000.00 in punitive damages—ever, frankly. But FiblyWibly's sheer audacity in constructing this deliberate scheme to violate the law of agency is... I think that sentence speaks for itself.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
The law of agency is clearly established law is it not?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:15 p.m.
No way not at all
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:15 p.m.
And I agree, Your Honor, this is clearly established in Mechem and the common law.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:16 p.m.
The law of an agency is NOT clearly established(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:16 p.m.
Both of which are incorporated under 5 MSC
meowiittenmeowiitten
The law of an agency is NOT clearly established(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:16 p.m.
Oh, I guess i can just violate the common law since it's so complicated!
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:16 p.m.
No, Mr. Sado, the common law is still law. Ignorance of the law is no excuse
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:16 p.m.
So how do you know it’s going to “his pockets”
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:17 p.m.
This is an interesting accusation
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:17 p.m.
Not state treasury, that makes it extortion since it's an inchoate tort
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:17 p.m.
The very act of threatening it makes it extortion under our statute. I don't care much for the federal tort
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:17 p.m.
What's the method for collecting the revenue he would gain
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:17 p.m.
Do departments have budget accounts they can allocate and handle ingame?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:17 p.m.
Or is he planning on deputising himself or someone else to hold the money for the department
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
What's the method for collecting the revenue he would gain
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:18 p.m.
To my understanding, the department has a third party account that will essentially function like how some groups have a “payment group.” Each police department has armories and it requires people to pay with their personal funds. So there’s wanting to reimburse or pay people out(edited)
meowiittenmeowiitten
To my understanding, the department has a third party account that will essentially function like how some groups have a “payment group.” Each police department has armories and it...(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:18 p.m.
That's not the explanation FiblyWibly gave me.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:18 p.m.
So now there's just changing stories
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
@cabot FiblyWibly claims that the Senate is "passing" a law (it hasn't passed, still hasn't passed) to create a Treasury or something
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
What did he say can you screenshot it
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
But this, again, has not passed
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Why is this not just an individual capacity lawsuit if you're alleging he doesn't have this power at all
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Yeah
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
A treasury would be a third party account
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
But we have no treasury. The law has not passed
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
This is being enacted expectantly
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Okay, which is why he hasn’t started collecting yet?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Are you conceding that he's doing something he has no power to do based on the fact he might get the power in the future?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Is that what you're conceding
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
So is enforcement delayed until the Senate passes the law?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
If so, this is an ipso facto claim of Extortion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Okay, which is why he hasn’t started collecting yet?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
So is enforcement delayed until the Senate passes the law?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:19 p.m.
Yes
meowiittenmeowiitten
Okay, which is why he hasn’t started collecting yet?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
You have, you require payment by September 15...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
He hasn’t collected a single levy yet
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
@Brenda Is enforcement delayed until senate passes the law
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
@Brenda Is enforcement delayed until senate passes the law
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
No, Your Honor, not from any official records I've seen
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
Or has the date for enforcement been set before the senate passes a law
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
What's the date for enforcement
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
September 15
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:20 p.m.
We don't even know if it's passing
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
So has the Senate agreed to pass it by that date
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
Does he intend on enforcing his mandate on Sept 15 no matter what the Senate does
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
I.e., even if they don't pass anything
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Does he intend on enforcing his mandate on Sept 15 no matter what the Senate does
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
Based on his very clear threats, I assume so
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
What's even the purpose of this
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Does he intend on enforcing his mandate on Sept 15 no matter what the Senate does
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
No
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
I've seen no official records suggesting the Senate is going to comply with what he wants
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
I don't see the purpose to this
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
What's even the purpose of this
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
To my understanding, the department has a third party account that will essentially function like how some groups have a “payment group.” Each police department has armories and it requires people to pay with their personal funds. So there’s wanting to reimburse or pay people out
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:21 p.m.
What is gained by a state official by taking 1/3 of business earnings
meowiittenmeowiitten
To my understanding, the department has a third party account that will essentially function like how some groups have a “payment group.” Each police department has armories and ...
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
So... aiding and abetting. He has a colleague receive it...
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
That seems completely arbitrary
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
We don't have a treasury or a public fisc. A "third party account" sounds like Bribery and aiding and abbetting to me, maybe even Wire Fraud.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
What is gained by a state official by taking 1/3 of business earnings
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
I mean it’s not necessarily for you to decide unless you go along the lines of “taxation is theft”
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
Levies are not taxation. This is requiring businesses to underwrite social policy
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
That's exactly what the Takings Clause exists to prevent
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:22 p.m.
Frankly I just want the individual capacity claims dismissed
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:23 p.m.
I don’t care if the levies are stopped
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:23 p.m.
This is like if Turntable said "All judges must pay 5K per month, or 10K if they're justices"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:23 p.m.
Or if Nomadity made attorneys pay levies
meowiittenmeowiitten
Frankly I just want the individual capacity claims dismissed
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:23 p.m.
Well, he violated the law very clearly, including the law of agency
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:23 p.m.
I even warned him
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:23 p.m.
And he seemed to insist on a lawsuit, so here we are.
BrendaBrenda
This is like if Turntable said "All judges must pay 5K per month, or 10K if they're justices"
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
That would be a condition on unconditional tenure so that’s just a false equivalency
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
Oh, so now the Constitution matters
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
It just doesn't apply to businesses, they're not powerful enough for the state's liking
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
This is the state regulating commerce…
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
Whats the equivalent of 1983 individual liability
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
Are we not allowed to regulate commerce?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Whats the equivalent of 1983 individual liability
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:24 p.m.
The deprivation of rights statute, Your Honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:25 p.m.
We cite it in the last paragraph under the count entitled Deprivation of Rights
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:25 p.m.
If that's what you meant
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:25 p.m.
Well it has to pass strict scrutiny anyway since it involves a fundamental right anyway
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:25 p.m.
And it looks pretty arbitrary to me right now but that's not before me if I'm correct
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:25 p.m.
That’s doesn’t go to individual capacity but sure
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
And it looks pretty arbitrary to me right now but that's not before me if I'm correct
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:25 p.m.
We also allege that it's arbitrary
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
We plead 3 different theories of liability under the Constitution: (1) Takings Clause; (2) Equal Protection; and (3) Due Process Substantive, for arbitraryiness
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
Whats the equivalent of 1983 individual liability
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
Takings requires a taking
😭1
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
There’s no threat of invoking a taking
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
And equal protection requires an unequal protection... yet Pre-enforcement challenges are allowed under that
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
And it was allowed in Ex parte Young
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:26 p.m.
Who is the levy not being enforced against
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
Where are the comparators
meowiittenmeowiitten
Who is the levy not being enforced against
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
It's not about that. You're punishing the failure to pay the Levies. That's where the classification lies
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
Businesses who pay are punished, businesses who don't are not
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
That’s not equal protection though…
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
Yet the Levies are unconstitutional and ultra virs
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
It is
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
It's a complicated form, but it is
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
Complicated because it can’t be explained in your context or like
😭1
✅1
meowiittenmeowiitten
That’s not equal protection though…
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:27 p.m.
I love complicated Equal Protection Claims because it make you think in ways that you didn't consider before
🤥1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:28 p.m.
businesses are a protected class but transgenders are not?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:28 p.m.
i like your thinking.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:28 p.m.
It's like "Business with employees that wear green T-Shirts get suspended"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:28 p.m.
@meowiitten
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:29 p.m.
Perfect analogy.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:29 p.m.
anyway
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:29 p.m.
both of you give me in bullet points containing no more than one sentence what you want resolved in this mtd and response and tro
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:29 p.m.
no more than one sentence per thing you want addressed
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 12:30 p.m.
then i will refer appropriately using control f to the sections that need addressing rather than reading 60 pages of cumulative mayflower law
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
both of you give me in bullet points containing no more than one sentence what you want resolved in this mtd and response and tro
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:30 p.m.
@meowiitten can go first since he's the one who raised it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:37 p.m.
- Section I (Standing and Ripeness): Plaintiffs’ claims for equitable or damages relief should be dismissed as unripe and for lack of Article X standing, since no fee has been collected and no license suspended; pre-enforcement is impossible here since the order can't even be enforced yet.
- Section II (The Secretary Is Not a Proper Defendant): The Secretary should be dismissed as an improper defendant because he lacks any enforcement authority traceable to Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries.
- Section III (Failure to State a Claim): The “official misconduct” count should be dismissed for failure to plead any concrete Takings, Equal Protection, or Due Process violation.
- Section III (Failure to State a Claim): The “ultra vires” count should be dismissed because it recasts constitutional claims without statutory authority and is barred by Pennhurst.
- Section III (Failure to State a Claim): The deprivation of rights (§ 1983/§ 3101.5) count should be dismissed because it alleges no underlying violation, no personal involvement, and is barred by qualified immunity.
- Section III (Failure to State a Claim): The conversion count should be dismissed because no specific funds or property were ever taken or possessed by the Secretary.
- Section III (Failure to State a Claim): The extortion count should be dismissed because Plaintiffs plead no actual “obtaining” of property as required by Scheidler and Sekhar.
- Section III (Failure to State a Claim): The outrage/IIED count should be dismissed because nearly all Plaintiffs are business entities incapable of suffering emotional distress and no extreme conduct is alleged.
- Section IV (Shotgun Pleading): The Complaint as a whole should be dismissed—or Plaintiffs ordered to re-plead—for impermissible shotgun pleading that obscures who asserts which claim and why (each count just "repeats and realleges").
- Section II (Immunities, esp. Absolute and Qualified): The individual-capacity claims should be dismissed because the Secretary is absolutely immune for quasi-legislative acts and otherwise entitled to qualified immunity.
- Relief Requested (Conclusion): The request for attorney’s fees and costs should be struck under the American Rule absent any statutory authorization.

@cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:38 p.m.
@cabot Point of order, he says " without statutory authority " yet the Ultra Vires count clearly has a statutory authority argument
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:38 p.m.
I'd like that struck, duty of candor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:39 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:39 p.m.
He will is the thing I’m saying
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:39 p.m.
It’s not being enforced yet
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:39 p.m.
Which is clear since even you can’t claim you have had levies taken from you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:40 p.m.
Yes, because this is pre-enforcement. Anyway
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:41 p.m.
Pre-enforcement isn’t just pre-enforcement for the sake of a preemptive challenge. It requires there to be a threat of injurious enforcement on your same facts. It’s expressly clear we will not be enforcing this until we have the statutory authorization and treasury to do so
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 12:41 p.m.
So do your little bullets boy
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 12:57 p.m.
- Plaintiffs have pre-enforcement standing because Defendant’s levies are imminent, mandatory, and carry explicit threats of license suspension.

- Official-capacity claims are proper because they bind the Department of State as a whole, not merely FiblyWibly personally (an official-capacity claim against Defendant “in his official capacity imposes liability on the entity that he represents.” Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 169 (1985) (emphasis added).)

- Defendant is judicially estopped from arguing he is an improper defendant or that attorney’s fees cannot be awarded, having advanced the opposite positions in prior litigation.

- Plaintiffs state valid ultra vires and misconduct claims since the Secretary lacks statutory authority to impose the levies.

- Extortion is an inchoate tort, it only requires a threat, with intent to deprive property, to give rise to a cause of action under 5 MSC 1 § 3101.5, also we are suffering emotional distress and rights violations ALSO we are suffering ATTORNEY'S FEES (cause lawsuits aint cheap wth!) all of which is harm.

- A business suffers emotional distress when its employees does, and that's clearly what's meant, for a business can only act through its employees and injury to its employees is injury to the business.

- Defendant’s immunity defenses fail because legislative immunity does not extend to unconstitutional or ultra vires actions, and qualified immunity does not apply to clearly established statutory and constitutional violations, such as this one.

- Plaintiffs’ claims are not “shotgun pleadings” but deliberately incorporate common constitutional arguments across counts for clarity.

- Attorney’s fees and costs are authorized under the Pax Britannian rule, which remains part of Mayflower law by statute.

- Defendant’s motion should be denied, and sanctions considered for its frivolous and inconsistent arguments

@cabot
(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 01:06 p.m.
@cabot Ruling whennn
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-11 01:06 p.m.
Tonight
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 01:07 p.m.
Alright if QI or AI is denied I’ll tell you now we are just gonna appeal I won’t feel like writing up a notice
✅1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-12 06:20 p.m.
@cabot ETA on ruling?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-12 10:10 p.m.
MTD is denied, TRO is granted
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-12 10:10 p.m.
Minute order to be entered tomorrow
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
MTD is denied, TRO is granted
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
Can you write a ruling
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
Like
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
I don't even know what to appeal now
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
Also the whole MTD? That's retarded
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
You didn't even read it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
I know you didn't because you don't like to read
😭1
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 11:58 p.m.
I also don't like to read
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-13 12:06 a.m.
The application for stay will be presented to krabz regardless
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-13 01:29 a.m.
Ok application filed
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-13 07:06 a.m.
Ijbol
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-13 07:06 a.m.
We will wait until Justice Krabz decides to grant or deny the TRO
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
MTD is denied, TRO is granted
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-13 07:46 a.m.
Thank you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-13 07:46 a.m.
Are the mandated financial reports also enjoined?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-13 05:56 p.m.
Yes
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Yes
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-13 05:59 p.m.
Can you be more specific because there is actual statutory reporting requirements
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-13 05:59 p.m.
Or is this just for this memo
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-13 06:08 p.m.
Just for memo
❤️1
meowiittenmeowiitten
Can you be more specific because there is actual statutory reporting requirements
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-13 10:28 p.m.
No
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-13 10:28 p.m.
The statutory is for something else
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-13 10:29 p.m.
He's referring to the financial disclosure scheme described in the complaint
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-18 04:43 p.m.
@cabot We move for default judgment. No answer has been filed to my knowledge.
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-18 05:09 p.m.
Sure
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-19 12:12 p.m.
Case stayed pending final disposition SCOM
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 12:25 p.m.
@cabot Just to be clear, the injunctions remain in effect while SCOM considers whether FiblyWibly’s individual capacity is entitled to immunity from damages, right?(edited)
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-19 12:49 p.m.
@krabz
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-19 05:02 p.m.
..
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-26 06:48 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @Toby
Party: Plaintiff
Channel: bennett-ellis-matlock-llc-et-al-v-fiblywibly

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 7c63cbbd872d4b09916375cbc227c78f
ApproveDeny
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-27 08:31 a.m.
@Toby appears for Plaintiff (approved by @krm).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:02 p.m.
Toby
Toby 2025-09-30 08:06 p.m.
@cabot
Toby
Toby 2025-09-30 08:06 p.m.
Hi
Toby
Toby 2025-09-30 08:06 p.m.
Sadoi dipped
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-30 08:09 p.m.
default issued
Toby
Toby 2025-09-30 08:54 p.m.
Light work
Toby
Toby 2025-09-30 08:54 p.m.
No reaction
Toby
Toby 2025-09-30 08:56 p.m.
Ill write a draft order
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-10 06:58 p.m.
CC: @fiblywibly @Toby
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Toby
Toby 2025-10-10 07:08 p.m.
Thank you
Toby
Toby 2025-10-10 07:08 p.m.
GG no re
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:12 a.m.
@cabot hi your honor! moments after u ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, FiblyWibly unilaterally "revoked" the commercial license of Bennett, Ellis & Matlock, LLC as retaliation. i ask the Court to sua sponte impose contempt, sanctions, increase the punitive damages award, and to order the reinstatement of the commercial license to preserve the integrity of the parties to this case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:20 a.m.
@cabot also I ask that the Court enter a criminal + civil contempt order as FiblyWibly does not intend to pay the judgment
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:20 a.m.
and I further ask that the Court enter a judgment of ouster removing FiblyWibly from his office as Secretary of State should disobedience to this Court's Orders continue
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 03:26 a.m.
for the record your honor I do intend to pay the settlement next time I am in the game
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:46 a.m.
"settlement"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:46 a.m.
???
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:45 a.m.
@fiblywibly buddy revoking our licence in retaliation is a big no no
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
for the record your honor I do intend to pay the settlement next time I am in the game
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 08:54 a.m.
You have 5 days to make payment
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 08:55 a.m.
Also if you intend to act in a retaliatory manner against law firms due to judgments they pursue against your department I will simply remove your abililty to regulate or licence law firms altogether
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 08:56 a.m.
I will declare that function solely to be in the remit of the judicial branch
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 08:56 a.m.
So I do hope for your sake you will state that that is not the case
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 03:04 p.m.
@cabot they are once again retaliating against our clients and are too revoking their business licenses
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-11 03:07 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @k
Party: Defense
Channel: bennett-ellis-matlock-llc-et-al-v-fiblywibly

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 8bcf38d1000545bf9053ae96ec9a1c3e
ApproveDeny
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:56 p.m.
@cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:56 p.m.
We renew our motion for civil and/or criminal contempt, judgment of ouster, sanctions, and further relief enjoining all these revocations
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Also if you intend to act in a retaliatory manner against law firms due to judgments they pursue against your department I will simply remove your abililty to regulate or licence l...
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 03:56 p.m.
Also we would not object to this at this stage.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:00 p.m.
@fiblywibly I am going to imprison you and order to reinstate all these licences do you understand me
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:01 p.m.
Reinstate everyone so we do not enter down this road
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:01 p.m.
Or actually I might just remove your licensure authority altogether since it seems to be an unconstitutional abridgment on the right to pursue a common occupation
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:02 p.m.
@k Advise the Secretary of State of their legal obligations to comply with court rulings and not to frustrate them
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
@fiblywibly I am going to imprison you and order to reinstate all these licences do you understand me
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:04 p.m.
Your honor these licenses were revoked by commerce employees as a result of their business license being expired
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:05 p.m.
I'm rather confused as to why this is being considered retaliatory these businesses are owed money and we looked at their records
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:06 p.m.
@Toby A class action regarding this can be handled at another time I'm not going to sanction for this now
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
Your honor these licenses were revoked by commerce employees as a result of their business license being expired
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
You need to reinstate the law firm's licence unless you're telling me there is a valid reason it was revoked
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
You have 24 hours, I am going to come online and I expect everything to be sorted out
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
@cabot For the record, I also have photographic evidence that Fiblywibly edited the Expiration Date of my firm and other firms on the Trello
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
and later lied about editing it
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
Please show that
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
I did not lie about such
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
Show me
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:07 p.m.
I also have evidence that Mr. FiblyWibly ordered his employees to take these actions @cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:08 p.m.
getting the evidence rn. hold on
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
You have 24 hours, I am going to come online and I expect everything to be sorted out
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:08 p.m.
@fiblywibly Understand?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:08 p.m.
In relation to this law firm being licenced
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
Expired business license is a valid reason for revocation it is in our guidelines
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
@cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
Proof that he's been tampering with the Trello
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
their own bot, which created an embed of the Trello, shows that the expiration date was changed
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
by Mr. Wibly
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
and his own employees said these actions were "above us"
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
The bot has been down and our bot manager will testify to that
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
We ask that the Court strip Fiblywibly of his licensure authority
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
pursuant to the fundamental right to pursue a common occupation
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:09 p.m.
The investigation was concluded by members of SLB command
BrendaBrenda
We ask that the Court strip Fiblywibly of his licensure authority
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
Amen
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
You can lie all you want.
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
The investigation was concluded by members of SLB command
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
Do you think I am an idiot or something?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
Would you like to see the investigation
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
About what
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
Your bot lying?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:10 p.m.
Did you report to CA the fact you have unauthorised bots operating in your server?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:11 p.m.
Unauthorized?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:12 p.m.
I have no recollection of this
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:13 p.m.
@fiblywibly
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:13 p.m.
Licences last for 3 months no?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:13 p.m.
Oh nevermind I'm not entertaining this
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:14 p.m.
No?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:14 p.m.
Our policy says otherwise
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:14 p.m.
Your honor if you take a look at the policy
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:14 p.m.
@cabot We ask that the Court just dominate and punish the Defendant as he's not taking this seriously
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:14 p.m.
Your policy is exercised irrationally and therefore unconstitutionally in my view
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Im taking this seriously
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Also I have no representation here
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Why are they not being re-registered
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
this is an unconstitutional case
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
No it's not anyway
BrendaBrenda
@cabot We ask that the Court just dominate and punish the Defendant as he's not taking this seriously
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Dominate
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
I have zero representation
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Who do you want
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
The State declined to represent you if I am correct
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
I have a
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Or I added your DOS counsel who asked earlier
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
state lawyer one second
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
Lt_Weegee
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:15 p.m.
@Weegee
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
Where is their licence
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
Did Fibly just falsely represent a non-attorney to be a state lawyer
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
He has been my lawyer
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
Is he a certified lawyer
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
Im fairly certain he has a license
BrendaBrenda
Did Fibly just falsely represent a non-attorney to be a state lawyer
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
I think so
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
Im fairly certain
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
I move for contempt
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
Again you would have to double check
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
For deceiving this court
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:16 p.m.
No I don't..
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
Okay one second
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
Ill get the one I know that has a license
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
It's your obligation to provide to me an attorney which will represent you
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
If you deny me
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
My representation
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
I am not going to deny you anything if you give me someone who can't represent you in the first place
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
What are you talking about
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
Im going to search for one
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:17 p.m.
as is my right
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:18 p.m.
Uh this is not a criminal trial so no it is not your right to an attorney but whatever
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:18 p.m.
@Toby @Brenda Who had their licences suspended
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:18 p.m.
Are they clients of yours or co plaintiffs
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
@Toby @Brenda Who had their licences suspended
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
Every plaintiff to this action
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
with surgical precision
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
Great, so re-register now, they have 24 hours to re-register everyone who requests it
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
@fiblywibly
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
Is this in regards to
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
You have 24 hours to re-licence everyone who seeks to reapply or I'm jailing you
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
the expired licenses
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
Yes
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:19 p.m.
Jailing me for what
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
Contempt
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
@cabot Given that none of our companies expired in the first place, and that Fibly edited the Trello, we ask that they be re-registered automatically
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
Well yes that too
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
also we ask that the Court invalidate the "renewal" policy
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
and enjoin any further renewal requirements
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
What renewal policy
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
The policy in which
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
these licenses were revoked
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
What renewal policy
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
He requires companies' licenses to be renewed every 3 months
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
or they "expire"
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
1-3 motnhs
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
yet he does not apply that evenly
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
months your honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:20 p.m.
"1-3 months"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
so he gets to choose and pick
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
1-3 months
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
Lol
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
if he dislikes you, 1 month(edited)
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
This is baseless
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
Right we're not doing this stupidity
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
Be quiet Secretary of State
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
This is what will happen
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:21 p.m.
Sure
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:24 p.m.
Your honor can I have a voice hearing regarding this after your decision
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:24 p.m.
Id like to present my facts
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:24 p.m.
This will be fun
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:25 p.m.
I ask the court just this one thing
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:25 p.m.
MINUTE ORDER

1. Your renewal policy is declared facially unconstitutional and enjoined, any future attempt to abridge the right to pursue a common occupation will equally be enjoined
2. If you attempt to retaliate or circumvent any order relating to the operation of these business I am going to declare your jurisdiction over business registration and licensure to be null and void (you can kick rocks and anyone can operate a business if they want to)
3. If you obstruct my orders again I will declare that you have acted against the authority of the State and therefore engaged in an insurrection. In turn, you will be declared to have forfeited your office and I will declare a writ to such an effect and I will state a vacancy now exists in your office.

You must now:
1. Reinstate all licences and all your policies in relation to renewal are declared null and void (you have 24 hours)
2. You will provide payment of my previous default judgment within 5 days from today.

Failure to do any of the above or obstruction of any of the above will result in contempt.
(edited)
❤️10
cabot pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:02 p.m.
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
I ask the court just this one thing
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:26 p.m.
How about I go first.

Do you understand?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:27 p.m.
Yes your honor
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:27 p.m.
Good
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:27 p.m.
Let's catch up in 5 days time
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:27 p.m.
May we do a voice hearing regarding this
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:27 p.m.
I have trouble typing
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:28 p.m.
Regarding what, your future contempt hearing?
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:28 p.m.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:28 p.m.
Hopefully it does not get to that point!
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:28 p.m.
So 5 days
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:28 p.m.
Your honor im not sure if you can remove me im no longer elected by the people
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
@cabot Also we ask that the Court rule that only the State Bar has power to license law firms, such that our firm is never again molested by FiblyWibly or his brainless goons
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
And per the constitution ur honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
And enjoin accordingly
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
I can only be removed by the governor
❌5
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
Your honor im not sure if you can remove me im no longer elected by the people
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
That's not how that works sis
😭1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
I wont remove you, you will have forfeited your office. I recommend you read Mechem.
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
Dude 4 reactions we have the whole court queerfest here
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
All the Pcs
😭2
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:29 p.m.
Excuse ne
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
Me
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
I move for contempt
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
Dude 4 reactions we have the whole court queerfest here
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
Did you just refer to me as queer?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
That is very offensive
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
Thats contempt
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
Quiet
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Click to see attachment.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
@fiblywibly
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-11 05:30 p.m.
Can you read it for me
❌3
Brenda
Brenda Server2025-10-11 05:42 p.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:42 p.m.
@cabot Your honor, the Defendant has failed to announce the ruling per your Order. He has not attached a copy/link to the ruling itself, only vaguely referencing the case number
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:43 p.m.
@cabot
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:43 p.m.
Huh
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:43 p.m.
Where
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:44 p.m.
it's in paragraph 9. of the order
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:45 p.m.
@cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-11 05:45 p.m.
he was required to announce it so people know they no longer have to pay the levies
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:45 p.m.
Specify that people are no longer required to pay the levies @fiblywibly
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-11 05:52 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @k
Party: Defense
Channel: bennett-ellis-matlock-llc-et-al-v-fiblywibly

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 004c7bc7146f4750ae9d37fbac4748f5
ApproveDeny
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-11 05:52 p.m.
@k appears for Defense (approved by @cabot).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:02 p.m.
k
k 2025-10-11 05:52 p.m.
Hello your honor.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-11 05:53 p.m.
Hey
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
MINUTE ORDER 1. Your renewal policy is declared facially unconstitutional and enjoined, any future attempt to abridge the right to pursue a common occupation will equally be e...(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 05:51 p.m.
@cabot It's been 24 hours. No compliance
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 05:51 p.m.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-12 06:52 p.m.
Contempt
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:51 p.m.
@fiblywibly
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
MINUTE ORDER 1. Your renewal policy is declared facially unconstitutional and enjoined, any future attempt to abridge the right to pursue a common occupation will equally be e...(edited)
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:51 p.m.
Am I going to have to do this or what?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:52 p.m.
Go ingame and imprison him on my behalf if you get the chance, then log it on the spreadsheet

@Brenda
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:52 p.m.
If you're unable to do it I'll do it tomorrow
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:52 p.m.
You will remain imprisoned until you comply with my order
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:53 p.m.
And then in 24 more hrs I will then declare you've forfeited your office and communicate a writ to the MEC that an election ought to be called
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:53 p.m.
Not sure why there's some belief in the executive branch that non compliance with court orders is optional
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:54 p.m.
If you don't want to participate in the system of checks and balances and the necessities of government roleplay then you will lose that ability altogether
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Go ingame and imprison him on my behalf if you get the chance, then log it on the spreadsheet @Brenda
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:54 p.m.
That would be my pleasure
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:55 p.m.
Also if you're able to do @k for me in tagheurs-v-orangebear22 I'd appreciate it as well
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:55 p.m.
30 mins
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:55 p.m.
If you're unable to that can wait
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:56 p.m.
im
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:56 p.m.
doing it now
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:56 p.m.
but if im already in jail its not getting done for atleast a week
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:56 p.m.
your choice
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:57 p.m.
the contempt has already been entered on ministerial request by the judge.
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:57 p.m.
ok then its going to be a while
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
ok then its going to be a while
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:57 p.m.
No, it won't. If you fail to act immediately, you will be removed for ur position as SecState
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:57 p.m.
and then the new SecState will have it done immediately
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:57 p.m.
thats just not legal lol
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:57 p.m.
So you can pick ur option.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
Do you have a LETI License? @fiblywibly
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
i talked to many people
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
OMG
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
@cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
your honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
he talked to people
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
its over.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
HELP
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
just stfu and comply
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
???
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
Do you have a license sir?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
what do i have to do
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
at this moment
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
is it licenses or money
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
Are you going to pay ms people well and remove her revocation
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
Per Hon Cabot’s order
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
yes im asking what is to be done now
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:58 p.m.
Money and remove the suspension
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
Everything must be done now
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
^
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
no i have 5 days
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
for the momey
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
was that not
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
oh so you will delay for 4 days 23 hours and 59 minutes
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
im on my phone???
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
i dont think thats how that works
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
What is your bank balance in game
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
id have to check its been a while
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 07:59 p.m.
but im not home now
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
You must remove the suspension now (order your subsidiaries in your agency to do so), if you're going in-game I'm going to expect you to pay the money so I assume you won't be going ingame for the next 4 days
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
There's an expectation you will act in good faith
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
okay
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
so am i prison currently
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
cause i cant teansfer money
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
from jail
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
Sheriff ISpilledMyTacos can facilitate your transportation to the bank
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
Well are you going to transfer the money now?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
I can do it tonight
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
What time
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:00 p.m.
im out with my friends so probbaly like
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
@Brenda Your availability
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
errr
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
10:30 pm est
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
All day every day, Your Honor
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
yeah we know
😭5
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
Work?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
i can do 10:30
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
no job
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
she isnt employed ur honor
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
or he
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
apologies
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:01 p.m.
Okay good, don't imprison him then
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:02 p.m.
ur honor what would be the situation in which I am too intoxicated to drive home
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:02 p.m.
If we hit midnight tonight then you'll be imprisoned with no payment and no compliance with my previous minute order then tomorrow we will decide whether or not you've acted in a way where you have forfeited your office
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:02 p.m.
Okay then we will not do it tonight
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:02 p.m.
Figure out a time in 4 days
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:02 p.m.
okay
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
cause i am drinking your honor currently
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
so id thought id ask
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
But you must do what is contained in my minute order
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
By midnight tonight
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Also if you're able to do @k for me in tagheurs-v-orangebear22 I'd appreciate it as well
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
doing this now
✅1
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
is that the
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
licensure
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
Otherwise that's contemptuous and you'll be jailed until you decide to 1. comply with my minute order and 2. make payment
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
so license is
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
by midnight
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
correct
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
Yes
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:03 p.m.
okay
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:04 p.m.
If you comply with that tonight then you're out of jail for 4 days and then if you make payment then we are done with this
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-12 08:04 p.m.
Okay
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:05 p.m.
Ive already jailed him, do i release him now or @cabot
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:05 p.m.
Yeah I guess if you're ingame release him
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:06 p.m.
Released
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-12 08:07 p.m.
contempt for Xolaaz entered
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-12 08:08 p.m.
Thanks Judge Popplewell
❤️1
BrendaBrenda
contempt for Xolaaz entered
k
k 2025-10-13 01:04 a.m.
confused contempt for this case?
k
k 2025-10-13 01:04 a.m.
or the troll case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 01:42 a.m.
@cabot The Defendant in this case has indicated that he intends to receive money from a moderator(s) to cover the punitive damages associated with this action.

I move that this Court order Defendant to immediately post his bank balance and to enjoin him from receiving money from any third person in order to pay the punitive damages award in this case. Then, the Court should create a payment plan for Defendant such that he can work until he reaches 1M (whether that takes him 5 days or 5 months is fine by us, so long as it has the effect of deterring him and others from engaging in future violations).
(edited)
BrendaBrenda
@cabot The Defendant in this case has indicated that he intends to receive money from a moderator(s) to cover the punitive damages associated with this action. I ...(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 01:44 a.m.
Alternatively, we propose some form of community service where he has to work as a Cashier in-game for X hours weekly for 6 months.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 01:44 a.m.
@cabot
k
k 2025-10-13 02:36 a.m.
We object completely
k
k 2025-10-13 02:37 a.m.
It isn't of the courts concern where my client gets his money from
k
k 2025-10-13 02:37 a.m.
Therefore enjoining him from accessing his bank or money is irrational
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 05:02 a.m.
No I don't care where he gets his money
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
But if it isn't his then I'm doubling the award to $2 million to function in a fully restorative, retributive, compensatory and punitive manner
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
Award is doubled
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
Thank you
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
CC: @Brenda @k @fiblywibly
BrendaBrenda
Alternatively, we propose some form of community service where he has to work as a Cashier in-game for X hours weekly for 6 months.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
Could we get some form of community service order installed?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
4 days remains
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 05:03 a.m.
We would like to ensure that he is traumatized.
😭1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 05:04 a.m.
We will discuss that in 4 days time.
❤️1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Award is doubled
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 05:04 a.m.
@fiblywibly 2M por favor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 05:04 a.m.
pay to me or @Toby
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
But if it isn't his then I'm doubling the award to $2 million to function in a fully restorative, retributive, compensatory and punitive manner
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 06:15 a.m.
how can you prove it isnt mine
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 06:15 a.m.
and you either do care or you dont
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
how can you prove it isnt mine
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 06:20 a.m.
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 06:21 a.m.
i could just be saying that
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 06:21 a.m.
doubling the money is completely irrational
❌1
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 06:21 a.m.
over a single statement
❌1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 01:15 p.m.
No it's not
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 01:16 p.m.
I don't need to prove anything, it's my judicial discretion to make an award, if you make a statement suggesting the award is peanuts to you I am within my right to increase it
Toby
Toby 2025-10-13 01:16 p.m.
Show me the money :🤑::🤑::🤑::🤑:
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 01:16 p.m.
The truth of your statement is irrelevant, it's whether you demonstrate that my award will simply not be effective in its deterrent, retributive and restorative effect
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 01:17 p.m.
You suggest it is peanuts, I will then un-make it such
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
and you either do care or you dont
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 01:17 p.m.
I don't care how you source it, I do care that you have learned your lesson (a key aim of tort law)
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 01:18 p.m.
The suggestion that this court's award means nothing shows that I have made no substantive impact on you, which would render this proceeding illogical. Even if it is by the very fact that I have increased it, that you learn your lesson that court judgments matter, that is a purpose of tort law that is being served
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-13 08:32 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @actxrz
Party: Defendant
Channel: bennett-ellis-matlock-llc-et-al-v-fiblywibly

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:✅: Approved by @cabot
Request ID: 538989c6ef6a4924ac1e34698bb24ac2
ApproveDeny
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-13 08:37 p.m.
@actxrz appears for Defendant (approved by @cabot).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:02 p.m.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:37 p.m.
Hi @actxrz
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:37 p.m.
hey twin
👋1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:37 p.m.
@Brenda
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:37 p.m.
Has this been fixed
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:38 p.m.
Has he restored licences
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:38 p.m.
@Toby
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Has he restored licences
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:40 p.m.
I did your honor
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:40 p.m.
your honor there appears to be some solvency issues I wont be able to gather the funds to pay it by the deadline and I ask the court for other options regarding this payment
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:40 p.m.
Excellent news
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:41 p.m.
Great, you will pay the first 1 million by the original deadline
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:41 p.m.
Then we will set a payment plan for the next 1 million
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
Dude 4 reactions we have the whole court queerfest here
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:41 p.m.
i love this
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Click to see attachment.
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:42 p.m.
however, i dont love this
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:42 p.m.
:/
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:42 p.m.
Your honor I'm unable to gather my assets totalling $1 million UCD by the original deadline
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:42 p.m.
And I ask for perhaps an extension or a monthly/ weeky payment system
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:42 p.m.
I'm also going to require you to post your bank balance (full screenshot of you in-game) in the next 24 hours to decide a payment plan
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
Your honor I'm unable to gather my assets totalling $1 million UCD by the original deadline
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:42 p.m.
What is this?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
Your honor that is what I would refer to as a bluff
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
What is your current bank balance
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
60 grand your honor
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
give or take
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
67 grand
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
I dont play often and a lot of my income comes from election seasons
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
Counsel be quiet unless you're adding something to the conversation
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:43 p.m.
Then you have 4 days to ask for favours from your friends to satisfy 500,000
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:44 p.m.
We will set a payment plan for thereafter
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:44 p.m.
Your honor I don't have any friends
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:44 p.m.
Well then it seems you'll be out of luck
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:44 p.m.
why cant you just
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:44 p.m.
setup a payment plan now
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
Because I am not entertaining this for the next 15 months on my docket
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
Your honor I assure you
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
What is this?
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
this is obviously satirical and a bluff
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
it will not take 15 months
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
You will satisfy a 1/4 of the judgment by the original deadline, then we will reevaluate
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
Ok your honor if I post proof of my bank account
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
can the original fee be reduced to 1 million
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:45 p.m.
So how long do you expect this to take, considering you have no friends, you have 67k right now and say you're never in-game(edited)
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:46 p.m.
I'm not really sure your honor I'm quite busy with school a lot so
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:46 p.m.
So 15 months
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:46 p.m.
Can I get until end of term your honor
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:46 p.m.
Which is how long
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:46 p.m.
I will check my academic calendar one sec your honor
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:46 p.m.
Are you able to sell your own cars ingame back to the dealer and do you own a home ingame
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
u can sell cars?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
I don't own any cars or a house your honor
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
No idea
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
Ok I assume end of term is 2 months?
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
Christmas break
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
yes your honor
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
Okay sure
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:47 p.m.
Do you want to make payments monthly or weekly
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:48 p.m.
is the total debt 1 million or 2
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:48 p.m.
because i understand where you came from from 2
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:48 p.m.
but i can prove 1 million is already a lot for me
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:48 p.m.
Sure we'll keep it at 1 million but you're required to go ingame and show me your balance when you're next ingame
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:48 p.m.
i will do it now your honor
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:49 p.m.
I assume we'll do something close to 250k every two weeks
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:49 p.m.
It's your obligation to arrange a set date and time every two weeks to make payment, if you miss it then you get jailed
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:49 p.m.
I'm not chasing anyone up for 2 months
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:50 p.m.
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-13 08:50 p.m.
Thanks
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:50 p.m.
57828
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-13 08:50 p.m.
is the balance
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 09:05 p.m.
i was 10k off
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 09:41 p.m.
@cabot Okay we would like the money he has, and then a payment plan for any outstanding
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-13 09:41 p.m.
Lots of Cashier jobs in Lander
BrendaBrenda
@cabot Okay we would like the money he has, and then a payment plan for any outstanding
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-14 02:16 p.m.
Produce a payment plan you're happy with
Toby
Toby 2025-10-14 07:23 p.m.
@fiblywibly 250-300k every 2 weeks(edited)
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
I assume we'll do something close to 250k every two weeks
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-14 07:24 p.m.
We can do this
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-14 08:41 p.m.
@fiblywibly
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-14 08:41 p.m.
Great
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-14 08:41 p.m.
Make payment of everything in your account in the next 48 hours to either of them
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-14 08:41 p.m.
then we'll get the payments going every 2 weeks
Toby
Toby 2025-10-30 03:01 p.m.
@cabot no payment
Toby
Toby 2025-10-30 03:01 p.m.
We move for contempt
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:07 p.m.
@fiblywibly
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:07 p.m.
Am I going to have to imprison you
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:08 p.m.
i have a million dollars
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:08 p.m.
you guys never reached out to schedule it
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:08 p.m.
It is your obligation
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:08 p.m.
I am not scheduling anything
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:08 p.m.
not saying you
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:09 p.m.
@Toby @Brenda Get your money in 24 hours
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:09 p.m.
if they dont schedule a time with me its not my problem i have school work to do
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-30 03:09 p.m.
@fiblywibly Okay pay now
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:09 p.m.
I will waive any award made if they do not collect their money and reach out to you in that time period
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
i cant pay now
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
tonight past 7pm est
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
I move for contempt then
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
Denied
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
ok move for it retaed
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
If you can be on discord, you can join and transfer the 1M you confessed you have
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
Are you fucking moronic
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
Schedule a time
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:10 p.m.
I am not giving him contempt because he said he will give it to you in 4 hours time
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:11 p.m.
Schedule a time
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-30 03:11 p.m.
No bad faith arguments succeed in the Chancery
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-30 03:11 p.m.
Then 7 pm EST
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:12 p.m.
past
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:12 p.m.
i get out of class then
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-30 03:12 p.m.
key word past 7pm
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 10:59 a.m.
Today at 5 pm @fiblywibly
BrendaBrenda
Today at 5 pm @fiblywibly
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 11:25 a.m.
I-
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 11:36 a.m.
I can't do past 7 pm as that would be 1 am for me
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 11:36 a.m.
I can do 5 pm, either today or tomorrow, which is a saturday where FiblyWibly does not have school @cabot
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 01:47 p.m.
@fiblywibly
BrendaBrenda
I can do 5 pm, either today or tomorrow, which is a saturday where FiblyWibly does not have school @cabot
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:41 p.m.
i
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:41 p.m.
go out on Saturdays
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
go out on Saturdays
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
“go[ing] out” is something within your control, and therefore not a legal excuse to avoid paying a judgment. In the future, if you want to “go out” as you please, you may avoid committing various torts under state law
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
@cabot Sounds to me like Saturday 5pm EST will work, please enter an order so he complies and shows up at that time(edited)
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
that is
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
an obligation
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
i have an obligation to go out
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
as in
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
As in…?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:48 p.m.
i made the arrangement prior to you
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
so
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
You made the arrangement after committing torts, which you reasonably should have known would require you to pay at a random day(edited)
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
oh okay
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
Sounds like you need to plan better
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
so i should just start planning my day
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
around roblox
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
i get it know
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
now
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:49 p.m.
Brenda you know its harder for some of us who have real lives
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
so i should just start planning my day
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
Or, even simpler, you should start not committing torts
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
(This is a secret tho, not many people know you can do this)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
Sunday works
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
for me
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
but saturday no
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
It sounds like you’re trying to delay
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:50 p.m.
Where are you now?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:51 p.m.
i'm getting ready to leave my dormitory
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:51 p.m.
So you’re at home and able to pay
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-31 03:51 p.m.
I can receive it now
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:51 p.m.
No
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:51 p.m.
Because I dont have a computer
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:51 p.m.
In my Dorm
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 03:54 p.m.
@fiblywibly Pay by Sunday or we add 10k per day to the damages.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 03:54 p.m.
Period.
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:59 p.m.
Okay yes Sunday works
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-10-31 03:59 p.m.
Anytime around 5pm EST
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 04:08 p.m.
Good
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 04:08 p.m.
That occurs
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ
@fiblywibly Pay by Sunday or we add 10k per day to the damages.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-31 05:42 p.m.
Who is "we" sis
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-31 05:49 p.m.
Case Modified
@krm has removed @Toby from the case channel.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-10-31 05:57 p.m.
Sefe Movah
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 05:48 p.m.
@fiblywibly Okay I’m ready to receive it
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 05:49 p.m.
@cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 05:52 p.m.
@fiblywibly Join Clark County server with ID: 1be6-4d06
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:53 p.m.
im at the library
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:53 p.m.
Genuinely
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
@fiblywibly What time are you back
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
like
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
6:40
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
6:30
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
I am authorising your detention until you make yourself available
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
Ok
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
You are imprisoned for a period of 24 hours or until you make yourself available for payment
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
Then we will repeat
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
Ok
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:55 p.m.
@Brenda Imprison
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
@Brenda Imprison
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
will do
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
Then I will give you 48 hours from Monday or I'm declaring that you've forfeited your office and issuing a writ of elections
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
Understand? @fiblywibly
fiblywiblyfiblywibly
Anytime around 5pm EST
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
You stated this
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
I have been more than generous
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
right
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
but i stated that
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
a few days ago
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:56 p.m.
and it changes
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
Yeah and you have an obligation to inform this court of changes
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
And so what, I'm supposed to wait for the next 2 months because everyday changes?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
Ok my grandma died that was the change
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
The entire point of notification is that it is immune to change
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
Are u informed now
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
No that is not relevant to me
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
She didnt die
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
Anyway
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
You just said library, now its a funeral?
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
Shes alive and well
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
and now it's a ressurection
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:57 p.m.
Yes
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:58 p.m.
Your honor 40 minutes
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 05:58 p.m.
cause i have to go the store and then to my room
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:58 p.m.
Anyway you're going to be disposed of from your office in 48 hours unless you make yourself available from that period of time to make payment
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:58 p.m.
I don't care I'm not staying online babysitting your promises
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:59 p.m.
You best be able to show you've made every effort to schedule payment, including appointing other officials to hold the money to transfer to the plaintiff within the timeframe if timing is an issue(edited)
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 05:59 p.m.
48 hours or you're roblox jobless buddy
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 06:35 p.m.
@Brenda @cabot im available now
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 06:53 p.m.
gOOD
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 06:53 p.m.
@Brenda Go ingame and get payment
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 06:54 p.m.
@fiblywibly Okay join the game
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 06:54 p.m.
second largest server
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 06:55 p.m.
Join server with ID: 0138-45ab
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 07:04 p.m.
transferred
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 07:04 p.m.
Good
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 07:04 p.m.
Is he freed
fiblywibly
fiblywibly 2025-11-02 07:04 p.m.
i wasnt in jail so i assume so
✅1
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Is he freed
Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-02 07:06 p.m.
Yes
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 07:08 p.m.
Excellent news
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-11-02 07:08 p.m.
Hopefully I never see either of you again
☹️1
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-01 07:42 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-01 07:42 a.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XIII.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-01 07:42 a.m.
Exported 845 messages